Risk Management
  • Home
  • Features
  • Columns
    • ForeFront
    • Last Word
    • Findings
    • Q&A
    • Time Line
    • Risk Atlas
    • Fine Print
  • Topics
    • Insurance
    • Enterprise Risk Management
    • Strategic Risk Management
    • Natural Catastrophes
    • Cyber Risk
    • Pandemics
    • Emerging Risks
    • International
  • Blog
  • Digital Issue
  • Subscribe
  • RIMS.org
  • Home
  • 2010
  • March
  • 1
  • Delay, Deny, Defend

Delay, Deny, Defend

Morgan O'Rourke
March 1, 2010May 10, 2013 No Comments
Book Review

Delay,-Deny,-Defend72The basic goal of insurance has always been to provide policyholders with the security that unforeseen losses will not drive them to financial ruin. Insurers promise that if you buy their product, they will cover you if something goes wrong. But increasingly, policyholders have discovered that getting a claim paid can be an arduous task as insurance companies do everything they can to avoid their obligations. Essentially, insurers have broken the core promise that justifies the very existence of their product.

The motivation for this behavior can be summed up in one word: profit. These days, insurance companies are more interested in serving their shareholders than their policyholders. And the easiest way to increase the bottom line is to reduce the losses that come from paying claims. So they delay to take advantage of float (the lag time between taking in premiums and paying out claims) and maximize their earnings on invested premiums. Or they just deny any responsibility to pay at all and then defend their refusal-in court if necessary-in the hopes that the policyholder will give up when they exhaust their resources or the will to fight.

This may not be a revelation to most of us, but Delay, Deny, Defend is more than just a statement of the obvious. It is also a fascinating look at how we got here and what we can do to protect ourselves. As the author deftly explains, the shift in focus from customer service to the bottom line was no accident but rather a systemic change in the way insurance companies do business borne out of the desperation of a 12-year soft market in the 1990s, a relaxed regulatory environment and the influence of consultants who demonstrated to the insurance industry that claims could become a profit center. And it is going to take consumer awareness, government involvement and harsher penalties if there is any hope in fixing what many believe to be a broken system. Only by ending the system of delay, deny and defend can insurers regain the confidence of the people they claim to serve.

Post navigation

Flip the Funnel
Mending a Broken Banking System

Related Articles

Strategic Risk Management

Recognizing Strategic Risks and the Role of the CRO

Donna Galer and Al Decker
March 8, 2021March 2, 2021 No Comments
FF-Mask Workplace Violence

Facing Customers Who Refuse to Wear Masks

Adam Jacobson
March 1, 2021February 26, 2021 1 Comment
FF-Double Ransomware

Ransomware Attackers Turn to Double Extortion

Hilary Tuttle
March 1, 2021February 22, 2021 1 Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 4 =

Current Issue

Don’t Miss Out

With many continuing to work remotely, keep in mind that you can always update your mailing address by clicking here to ensure future issues of Risk Management are sent directly to you.

RSS Risk Management Monitor blog

  • Texas Cold Crisis: Insurance Options for Severe Weather Disruption March 3, 2021
  • Preparing for the Next Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic at RIMS Content Roundtable March 1, 2021
  • Human Trafficking and Supply Chains: Q&A with Tim Nelson of the Slave-Free Alliance February 12, 2021
  • How to Prepare Now for Your Next Crisis Post-COVID February 3, 2021
  • Strengthening Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Efforts February 1, 2021
Copyright 2020. All rights reserved | Theme: OMag by LilyTurf Themes
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Contribute
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Contact
  • Privacy