Time Line: Fighting Intellectual Property Theft

 
 
A Time Line of IP Lawsuits
A Time Line of IP Lawsuits

Bill Gates once said “intellectual property has the shelf life of a banana.” Indeed, with the increasing sophistication of the internet, hackers and malicious employees, it is easy to see why he feels that way.

For centuries, copyrights and patents have granted protection and rights to the owners of original ideas and products. But rules, as some see, are made to be broken, and intellectual property—no matter how protected—is subject to theft.

Recent research by Verizon reported that there were 85 confirmed data breaches over the last two years that resulted in the theft of intellectual property. It also found that no organization was immune. The following are some of the more notorious and lucrative intellectual property cases to date.

 

Johnson & Johnson vs. Abbott Labs – February 23, 2011
Johnson & Johnson vs. Abbott Labs – February 23, 2011

In 2009, Johnson & Johnson accused Abbott Laboratories, maker of the arthritis drug Humira, of using technology patented by New York University and licensed exclusively to Johnson & Johnson’s Centocor division. Johnson & Johnson originally won the case and was awarded $1.7 billion for lost profits and damages, making it the largest patent-infringement award in U.S. history.

But the award didn’t stick. In February 2011, Abbott Labs succeeded in a bid to overturn the verdict. Johnson & Johnson appealed soon after, and in October 2012, the Supreme Court declined to review the ruling.

 

Play Video
Click To Play
St. Jude’s vs. Yongning Zou – April 22, 2011
St. Jude’s vs. Yongning Zou – April 22, 2011

A former employee of St. Jude Medical was found guilty of stealing trade secrets from his employer and using them to set up a rival medical device company, Nervicon. Yongning Zou, a former hardware design engineer with Pacesetter, St. Jude’s cardiac rhythm management division, allegedly stole documents relating to a crystal oscillator unique to St. Jude’s products. Zou left St. Jude in June 2009 and became a shareholder in Nervicon, a China-based medical device business. On April 22, 2011, a California jury awarded a total a total of $1.47 billion against Zou for theft of trade secrets and an additional $868 million against Nervicon.

Warners Bros. vs. Mike Tyson’s Tattoo Artist – April 28, 2011
Warners Bros. vs. Mike Tyson’s Tattoo Artist – April 28, 2011

Mike Tyson’s tattoo artist filed suit against Warner Bros. Entertainment weeks before The Hangover Part II’s May 26, 2011, opening, alleging that the movie’s use of his design, which was tattooed on the face on one of the movie’s characters was copyright infringement. S. Victor Whitmill claimed that since he owned copyrights to the “artwork on 3-D,” as he called it, the use of his design in the movie and in advertisements without his consent should be considered infringement. On May 24, 2011, Chief Judge Catherine D. Perry of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denied an injunction on the movie’s release but felt Whitmill did in fact have a case. On June 17, Warner Bros. and Whitmill settled for undisclosed terms.

Bratz vs. Barbie – August 5, 2011
Bratz vs. Barbie – August 5, 2011

Carter Bryant was working for Mattel when he allegedly came up with the idea for Bratz, a line of fashion dolls and merchandise manufactured by MGA Entertainment. The Bratz brand proved successful for MGA and was blamed for a 30% decrease in U.S. sales of Barbie dolls. In April 2005, MGA sued Mattel, claiming that their newer line of “My Scene” Barbie dolls were clear replications of the Bratz dolls look. Mattel then sued MGA for $500 million, claiming that Bryant created Bratz while he was working at Mattel. With both sides claiming the other stole trade secrets, the parties returned to court in January 2011. On April 21, 2011, a federal jury returned a verdict supporting MGA. On August 5, 2011, Mattel was ordered to pay MGA $310 million for attorney fees, stealing trade secrets and false claims.

Kevlar War – September 14, 2011
Kevlar War – September 14, 2011

In February 2009 DuPont sued Kolon Industries for stealing trade secrets concerning Kevlar, a high-strength synthetic fiber used in body armor. The suit alleged that Michael Mitchell, a former DuPont employee who worked at Kolon, had “retained certain highly confidential information on his home computer” that he illegally passed to his new employer. Mitchell pleaded guilty to theft of trade secrets and was sentenced to 18 months. On September 14, 2011, a civil court awarded Dupont damages of $919.9 million, and this October, a U.S. grand jury charged Kolon and five company executives with trade secret theft in an effort to take at least $226 million in assets from Kolon, a sum that represents the gross proceeds of the company’s sale of Heracron, the only direct competitor of Kevlar.

Bridgestone vs. Xiaorong Wang – August 14, 2012
Bridgestone vs. Xiaorong Wang – August 14, 2012

Xiaorong Wang, a former employee at Bridgestone Center for Research and Technology in Akron, Ohio, was charged with eight counts of theft of trade secrets and seven counts of making false statements to federal agents. The indictment against Wang alleges that, in April 2010, he stole Bridgestone’s proprietary trade secret information involving various projects and formulas related to rubber and other polymer-related projects. Wang was also charged with making false statements to FBI agents regarding, among other things, his alleged intention to accept employment at Suzhou University in China to establish a rheology polymer center. Wang’s case is pending.

 

More articles by »

About the Author

Emily Holbrook is editor of Risk Management, where she has worked since 2008. You can follow her on Twitter @RiskMgmtMonitor and read more of her writings at EmilyHolbrook.com.

 
 
 

Leave a reply

required

required

optional