Risk Management
  • Home
  • Features
  • Columns
    • ForeFront
    • Last Word
    • Findings
    • Q&A
    • Time Line
    • Risk Atlas
    • Fine Print
  • Topics
    • Insurance
    • Enterprise Risk Management
    • Strategic Risk Management
    • Natural Catastrophes
    • Cyber Risk
    • Pandemics
    • Emerging Risks
    • International
  • Blog
  • Digital Issue
  • Subscribe
  • RIMS.org
  • Home
  • 2016
  • June
  • 21
  • The Risky Side of Specialty Drugs

The Risky Side of Specialty Drugs

Bruce Roffé
June 21, 2016June 16, 2016 No Comments
Employee Benefits

shutterstock_324566462According to a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 63% of U.S. companies self-fund employee health benefits. Undoubtedly, these enterprises have carefully contemplated the risks associated with a high-cost, adverse health event and the risk managers at these companies have probably spent more than their share of sleepless nights fretting about a “bad luck” year with out-of-the-ordinary aggregate claims.

While these risks are real, and the financial impact can be significant for a self-insured group, another risk lurks right under their noses and rarely attracts the attention it deserves: specialty drugs.

These high-cost pharmaceuticals represent the fastest growing component of drug expenditures and one of the fastest growing healthcare costs in general. Fortunately, self-funded companies and the benefits advisors they rely upon can mitigate these risks with careful planning, employee education and disciplined prescribing protocols.

In order to address the financial risk associated with specialty drugs, employers need to first understand what they are and how they are used by employees. Specialty drugs treat chronic, rare or complex conditions like multiple sclerosis or certain types of cancers and can potentially deliver powerful, sometimes astonishing, therapeutic effects, as is the case with Gilead Sciences’ Harvoni, which virtually cures hepatitis C. Miracle results come with a steep price, however. They typically do not have generic, low-cost alternatives, and the prices can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars for a single course of treatment. Specialty drugs like Harvoni make up only 1% of all written prescriptions, but they account for 32% of all drug expenditures, and according to Express Scripts, they cost the U.S. health system as much as $100 billion per year.

How expensive are specialty drugs? The AARP Public Policy Institute found that in 2013, specialty drugs cost an average of $53,000 a year, and in 2015, the average annual price for specialty-drug therapy was twenty times greater than the average cost of a generic prescription medication. Plus, more people are taking these drugs each year; the number of Americans taking at least $100,000 worth of medications tripled from 2013 to 2014. For self-funded plans, these higher prices directly affect the cost of delivering health benefits, and their increasing usage poses significant financial risk.

Self-insured employers have multiple avenues to control costs related to specialty pharmaceuticals, starting with their pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The PBM sets the formulary, which identifies the medications employees can access. As the employer/payer, the company is in a position to influence its plan’s formulary so long as it meets government-mandated requirements. In addition, PBMs have contracts in place with national retail pharmacies to negotiate discounts on specific medications. They can also shave costs by encouraging employees to utilize mail order prescriptions, which typically cost less and improve medication adherence.

Mitigating against the risks of rising drug costs starts with plan design, such as creating a plan that includes a healthy dose of cost sharing. Cost sharing not only reduces an employer’s financial contribution to the delivery of care; it also motivates employees to take an active, participatory role in their health care, including the selection of medications. With this in mind, employers can work with their third party administrators  to design a plan that offloads a portion of prescription drug costs to the employee, particularly for more costly specialty pharmaceuticals.

A plan can also require pre-authorization or pre-certification prior to dispensing high-cost prescriptions. This “before-the-fact” notification ensures the prescription is actually necessary and provides an opportunity to explore less costly alternatives such as “step therapy” or “dosage management.”

Using step therapy, a patient begins treatment with a lower-cost drug to determine its therapeutic benefits before moving on to a higher-cost medication. With dosage management, the patient takes a small amount of a medication instead of the full course to gauge its effectiveness. If, for any reason the drug fails to produce the desired result, the health plan and the patient avoid unnecessary costs.

Educating employees about their prescription benefits—and their financial contribution toward prescription costs—can likewise motivate employees to inquire about alternative treatments. Employees should understand that it is beneficial to engage in a thoughtful dialogue with their prescribing physician and pharmacist about the health value of certain medications.

Technology can play a role too. Apps like “Prescription Saver” and “GoodRx” can help patients track down reasonable prices for their meds, which can vary depending on where they live, and which pharmacy they choose.

Modern medical research has translated into medical breakthroughs that save lives, extend lifespan and improve quality of life. However, healthcare payers, including self-insured employer groups, have to pay for those breakthroughs—often in the form of high-priced specialty drugs. But with the help of employees, companies can mitigate against the potential financial risk these medications pose to a self-funded health plan.

 

 

 

Post navigation

How Your CGL Policy May Help with Trademark Infringement Litigation
Turning Workplace Safety Into a Competitive Opportunity

Related Articles

FF Insurance Cases 2020 Legal Risk

Three Key Insurance Law Decisions from 2020

Joshua Gold
December 21, 2020December 8, 2020 No Comments
FF Future RM Risk Management

COVID-19 and the Next Generation of Risk Management

Dr. Kirk D. Fleming and Candace Dowling
December 16, 2020November 24, 2020 No Comments
FF Flu Health and Wellness

Maintaining Workplace COVID-19 Precautions During Flu Season

Mohannad Kusti
December 15, 2020December 11, 2020 No Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

seven + 6 =

Current Issue

Don’t Miss Out

With many continuing to work remotely, keep in mind that you can always update your mailing address by clicking here to ensure future issues of Risk Management are sent directly to you.

RSS Risk Management Monitor blog

  • Responding to Litigation Hold Notices January 25, 2021
  • How to Make the Most Out of 2021’s Virtual Conferences for Rising Risk Professionals and Employers December 30, 2020
  • After COVID, Cyberrisks Top Agenda for Risk Professionals in India, Marsh and RIMS Report December 21, 2020
  • PAID Act Becomes Law, Fixing Medicare Secondary Payer Flaw December 17, 2020
  • Three Ways to Reduce Insider Threat Risks During COVID-19 November 30, 2020
Copyright 2020. All rights reserved | Theme: OMag by LilyTurf Themes
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Contribute
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Contact